Get the TIC signed from the household record.
Send the TIC, lease and recertification notices for signature with ExactSign, included in Core. Residents and staff sign from any phone.
LIHTC SOFTWARE BUYER GUIDE
Your state form, income verification, project election and layered funding can’t be reduced to a “LIHTC supported” checkbox. Use this buying guide to challenge vendors on the actual certification file—and bring that same file to an ExactEstate demo.
The test isn't whether the vendor says 'LIHTC.' It's what happens when the property has exceptions.
Ask the vendor to set up the project as it actually exists: its minimum set-aside, applicable elections, state HFA, supporting documentation and layered requirements. Then watch what happens when information is missing.
Good LIHTC software knows the project elections, the unit designations, the rent and income limits actually in force, household composition, income and assets, the state or HFA context and its forms, the requirements tied to HOME, bonds or NHTF on the property, and where each recertification stands and who approved it.
A system that holds those as property facts behaves differently from one that holds them as fields somebody filled in. You find out which you are looking at by asking it a question that requires knowing them.
Make the vendor work through an actual over-income recertification. Can it show the project’s Average Income Test election if applicable, calculate the relevant threshold and track the Next Available Unit Rule by building? Ask to see affected comparable-or-smaller units and the review trail—not just a generic 140% warning.
ExactEstate flags the building and lists its over-income households, so your specialist picks the next comparable unit with the facts in front of them. See how ExactEstate’s LIHTC compliance software handles each of these.
Anyone can show a blank TIC form. Make the demo start with a real household record and continue through validation, review and the state form or supported export.
Then recertify the same household and watch which facts carry forward on their own and which have to be typed again.
A property with multiple funding sources tests whether the software can keep distinct rules straight—not simply display multiple badges.
"Supports layered funding" is a sentence, and sentences are cheap. Put your actual project stack in front of the system and watch what it does with a unit that carries two programs whose requirements disagree. If you run more than one program, see how affordable housing compliance software keeps each program’s rules apart.
Good software refuses to decide anything it does not have the facts for. Ask each vendor to show you a case their software refuses to decide.
A system with no refusal cases is not more capable. It will produce an answer whether or not it has what the answer requires, and you will not find out which until an audit.
The good version names what is missing: the election that was never recorded, the jurisdiction whose rule has not been configured, the authority it could not cite.
Ask these nine questions, in the same order, against one project from your own portfolio. Vendors control their own demos, so comparing them means bringing the scenario yourself and staying on it. Pick your layered property if you have one. Copy or print the list; it is not a lead form.